Redesigning the Tutor
Operations System for Online
Education

Class Mentor dashboard shown across desktop and mobile devices

In the dual-teacher model, one instructor broadcasts to thousands of students while Teaching Assistants (TAs) manage localized pods. As Senior Product Designer at TAL, I led the redesign of Class Mentor — the operational dashboard these TAs run their classrooms on.

Role
Senior Product Designer
Company
TAL
Product
Teacher Client
Timeline
2023–2025

Background

TAs monitor engagement, manage real-time attendance, and run interactive exercises. The model's success depends on their ability to spot and support struggling or distracted students mid-broadcast.

As the user base grew, that operational overhead became a business bottleneck — the fragmented, multi-screen workflow had to become a single dashboard.

Problem

TAs ran every live class across 10 disconnected tools: Excel for attendance, WeChat for parents, the internal 4S platform for data, plus separate video and chat dashboards.

Broadcast tool with a three-section split-screen stage
Three-Section Split-Screen
Instructor courseware playing next to the presenter's camera
Instructor Courseware / Video
Attendance tracked by hand in an Excel spreadsheet
Excel
Internal 4S platform showing a student record table
4S Management Platform
Legacy monitoring dashboard, a dense list of progress bars
Old Monitoring Dashboard
Newer monitoring dashboard with summary charts and video tiles
New Monitoring Dashboard
WeChat conversation with a parent
WeChat
Teacher-only chat room used during a live session
Teacher Communication Channel
Three parallel class discussion panels open side by side
Live Class Discussion Panel
Internal messaging platform used for team coordination
Internal Communication Platform
The redesigned one-stop monitoring dashboard, which replaced seven of these surfaces
One-Stop Monitoring Dashboard

Problem to Solve

TAs were forced to manage their classrooms across 10 different tools simultaneously — creating an unsustainable cognitive load during high-pressure live classes.

Research

To ground the redesign in reality, we combined qualitative shadowing with quantitative validation across the TA population.

User Observation

Shadowing a TA during a live broadcast

User Interviews

One-on-one interview session

Quantitative Surveys

Survey questionnaire

Surveys confirmed what we observed: the most demanding monitoring tasks were the least supported by the interface. Nearly every TA depended on continuous student video and uninterrupted access to the instructor's feed just to keep context.

Research Insights

TAs didn’t need more features — they needed one ecosystem. Context switching was crowding out the mentoring that was their actual job.

Consolidate the windows.
Minimise the switching.

Pre-class

Streamline attendance

In-class

Monitor engagement live

Post-class

Route parent feedback

What has to sit on one screen

Student dataAttendance · online · present
Student statusIn-class engagement
BehaviourPraise & corrective prompts
Learning contentKey concepts from the lead teacher

Design Objective

Three goals anchored the redesign: consolidate the scattered tools into one source of truth, automate routine workflows like attendance, and cut the visual clutter driving cognitive overload.

01

Unify

Consolidate fragmented tools into one workspace

02

Automate

Streamline repetitive operational workflows

03

Simplify

Reduce cognitive load with a clearer interface

Information Architecture & Layout Exploration

We evaluated six dashboard configurations (1:4, 1:1, 3:2, 1:3:1, 1:1:3, 1:2:2) against information density, efficiency, and visual hierarchy.

Overly symmetrical layouts (e.g., 1:1) lacked a clear focal point, while margin-heavy designs increased mouse travel and slowed response to critical alerts.

Info Density Task Focus Efficiency Rating

1:1 (Symmetrical)

1:1 symmetrical layout Low Split Focus 2 / 5

1:4 (Side-heavy)

1:4 side-heavy layout High Margin heavy 3 / 5

1:3:1 (Center Focus)

1:3:1 center focus layout Optimal Centralized 5 / 5
Brand Info Course Info Header Notifications & Tools Profile

Low-Attention Content Summary-Level Data

Learning Analytics Overview
Recommended Focus Areas Automatic Monitoring
+
Semi-Automatic Monitoring
Student Classroom Performance
Instructor Courseware / Video
Student Chat Panel

Low-Attention Content Course Progress Awareness

Medium-Priority Content & ActionsLarger Workspace

Primary Focus AreaPositioned at the Visual Center

High-Priority Content & ActionsPreserves Familiar Three-Panel Workflow

Attention Hierarchy

Low AttentionOverview & Awareness

Medium AttentionReview & Operate

High AttentionCore Focus & Actions

1 Pre-Class 2 In-Class 3 Post-Class

Pre-Class: Streamlining Attendance Workflows

The 15 minutes before a broadcast were a scramble: cross-reference an Excel roster, check 4S for live logins, then open WeChat to ping missing students one by one — error-prone, and stressful at exactly the wrong moment.

The redesigned dashboard surfaces real-time attendance and interaction readiness at a glance.

Redesigned pre-class dashboard: attendance rate, students online and participation at the top, with recommended follow-ups beside the class roster
[Placement] Top-Left Corner

Serves as the starting point of the visual scanning pattern, establishing a primary visual hierarchy.

Class summary tile: attendance rate 80% (80/100), 80 of 100 students online, 89% quiz participation, 85% quiz accuracy, 80 of 100 flagged for abnormal behaviour
Session start: Review student attendance

Verify data metrics based on questionnaire results

Chasing one absence used to take five steps across five separate tools. It is now a single click, without leaving the dashboard.

Before

Live Session Monitoring

Live session monitoring
View Absentee List

OA/4S

OA / 4S platform
Leave Verification

Wechat / 4S

WeChat / 4S
Contact Parents

Excel

Excel spreadsheet
Follow-up Records

Internal App

Internal app
Team Sync
After
Alerts tab: seven students flagged — five absent, one offline over 20 minutes, one idle over 40 minutes, each with a reminder count, renewal status and a one-click message action
The Alerts tab in context: seven flagged students on the left, the live class roster in the centre and the lecture video and chat on the right

Status

Based on questionnaire data, the system consolidates the abnormal student states teachers care about most — Absent / Idle / Offline — into dynamic alert prompts.

  • 15 mins pre-class: alerts for students who haven't shown up.
  • In-class: alerts for offline / idle students.

Actions

One-click attendance / idle / offline reminders — send WeCom (Enterprise WeChat) notifications to parents.

1 Pre-Class 2 In-Class 3 Post-Class

In-Class: Student Engagement Monitoring

Student Analytics

Track learning metrics

Student analytics in the full platform: per-class roster with status, class time, participation, accuracy and speaking time

Video Monitoring

Monitor student engagement

Video monitoring in the full platform: AI-flagged student tiles alongside the alert feed and the live lecture video
Student Analytics
Student analytics module: per-class roster with each student’s live status, time in class, participation, accuracy and speaking count, plus one-click follow-up actions

Student learning data

The learning analytics module provides teachers with real-time visibility into students' online status and classroom engagement.

After class, the system automatically generates learning reports and sends them to parents, ensuring clear and continuous tracking of student progress.

AI-Assisted Video Monitoring

Monitoring dozens of student video feeds is the TA's most demanding task. In the old system, small thumbnails and manual scrolling made it easy to miss distracted or struggling students.

The new 1:3:1 layout introduces an AI-powered video grid that automatically detects and highlights abnormal behaviors (e.g., absence, poor lighting, disengagement) and prioritizes these feeds for quick review — shifting the TA's task from passive scanning to active mentoring.

Video Monitoring
Video monitoring grid: student tiles with AI flags for sleeping, away, poor posture and off camera, each with class time, participation and accuracy

In-Class: Driving Engagement & Recommendations

TAs are also expected to actively drive participation — but with the old tools they couldn't track in real time who was engaged and who was falling behind.

So we designed a recommendation layer that suggests interventions as performance data arrives — a streak of correct answers prompts a one-click note of encouragement.

Manual Monitoring

Track learning metrics

Recommended follow-ups with auto-follow off: streak, skipped and wrong-answer triggers, each with a student count and manual actions

Automated Monitoring

Monitor student engagement

Recommended follow-ups with auto-follow on: the system praises and reminds automatically, logging each action, with a manual section below
Focus Student Close Bond
@ Mention in Chat
Compose an @-mention in class chat, with the praise message and the card the student sees
💬 Direct Message
Compose a text direct message to 24 students, with the card the student sees
💬 Direct Message (Audio)
Record a 10-second voice message for 24 students, with the card the student sees
Student view: a multiple-choice question on a tablet, with the teacher’s encouragement appearing in the corner
Student View Demonstration
89%

Interaction Participation

Participation rate achieved during live interactive exercises using the new platform.

85%

Interaction Accuracy

Accuracy rate maintained by students, monitored seamlessly by TAs.

1 Pre-Class 2 In-Class 3 Post-Class

Post-Class: Automated Reporting for Parents

After class, summarizing performance for parents meant manually compiling data from several platforms.

The reporting module now aggregates attendance, participation, and behavioral data into a standardized learning report automatically.

"The automated reports save me at least an hour every day. I can finally give parents detailed feedback immediately after class finishes"

Jie Li — Lead Class Mentor

Parent report structure: brand and content, class performance, interaction performance, teacher evaluation and data notes mapped to the modular report — online status, student highlights, quiz performance, class participation and teacher feedback

Interaction Design Guidelines

Interaction design guidelines: navigation components Interaction design guidelines: input components Interaction design guidelines: input components continued

Impact & Results

The redesign consolidated 10 legacy tools into a single interface, and scored 8.3/10 in post-launch teacher satisfaction.

8.3/10

Teacher Satisfaction

Post-launch satisfaction score for the redesigned Class Mentor platform.

−70%

Task Completion Time

Core monitoring tasks take approximately 70% less time than the legacy multi-tool workflow.

Monitoring Efficiency

AI-assisted video monitoring improved preview and monitoring efficiency threefold.

Core monitoring tasks — attendance, engagement, parent communication — now take about 70% less time, and the 1:3:1 layout with AI assistance tripled video monitoring efficiency. The platform serves over 50,000 TAs, and that efficiency gain lays the groundwork for raising the tutor-to-student ratio: each TA supporting more students without diluting personal attention.

Reflection & Next Steps

Shadowing TAs in their actual working conditions is what made this work. Mapping their multi-tool reality first meant the solution addressed real cognitive bottlenecks rather than just looking modern.

Next: using the platform's own data for prediction and guidance, so the system anticipates what a TA needs before they go looking for it.

Next Case Study

Immersive Classroom

View case study →